In current weeks I possess noticed a GREAT MANY oft-répeated but factually wrong misconceptions perpetuated about the Kind 99 gun and the supposedly alarmingly dangerous 'final dump' Type 99. Let me start this little edjumacation by saying it clearly: There is certainly no like factor as a 'final ditch type 99'. This misnomer had been started when American servicemen, many óf whom could not go through or speak Japanese, did some stupid things when occupying post-war Japan. Key among these idiocies had been the firing of program ammunition in training guns that outwardly made an appearance to become Type 38 or Type 99 rifles, but were really crudely produced training guns with unrifled barrels. These had been typically not really marked as imperial hands and usually stated obviously on them that they were drill or training rifles (in Western).
Info needed: Nagoya Series 5 Type 99. Rifles with very early serial numbers. Glassparman what you need to do is buy the book The Japanese Type 99 Arisaka. Aug 24, 2011 trying to find date of manufacture, my first Arisaka type 99 If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. Mar 14, 2011 I was just given an Arisaka Type 99 rifle by my son, who picked it up at a garage sale. My question revolves around a serial number stamped on the left side of the receiver in arabic numbers. There is what appears to be a shield of some type before the 5 digit number and four interlocking circles following the numbers. Nov 28, 2010 Type 99 Nagoya Arisaka. The serial number would seem to place it somewhere in the middle of the. The bayonet is a Type 30 with a straight.
The expected grenading of guns resulted and the 'final dump 99' has been born. This belief was not helped by the primitive exterior appearance of actual late battle type 99 guns which shown the cost and period saving actions applied in Nazi Uk in the Kriegsmodell. Another possible source of the name emerged from the Western Unique Naval Gun which experienced a inexpensively team pot-iron receiver and usually appeared to become an hazardous rattletrap to GIs.
Today we know much better and the Remington 710 basically replicated the Special Naval Rifle activity óf WW2 in that thé bolt locked directly to lugs in the barrel or clip, the receiver serving just to keep the bolt as it has been cycled. Despite á shabby apeparance, thése had been functionally secure guns. But I digress.
Even more obviously: The Imperial Japan Army do not concern unsafe rifles. Every Kind 99 from the initial to the last underwent the same proof exams and was built to open fire many, many times.
The places of manufacturing that saw compromise had been in match and finish and steel conservation on stuff like buttplates ánd monopods that had no genuine field value. This is MUCH easier to demonstrate in photographic format. For guide, the first Type 99 series production began at Nagoya in August, 1939. Right here is usually a image of an earlier Kind 99, a 31st series Toyo Kogyo Type 99 produced in 1940 (on best) likened to a 7tl Series Nagoya late war gun made in 1944.
Japanese Arisaka Type 99
The bayonets proven with each gun are usually of the proper vintage for that rifle. Although not unsheathed, the top blade is usually fullered and the underside blade is usually not. The best rifle would have been issued with leather accoutrements (the buckskin sling proven is unique to this gun) and the lower rifle would have been released with a mix of canvas ánd rubberized canvas accoutréments as portrayed.
Right apart there are some apparent cosmetic variations, but surprisingly few practical distinctions. Both guns have got the exact same rifling (metford pattern) and are usually in 7.7 Western, though the earlier rifle appreciated the excess (for that timéframe) of a chromé-lined bore. Thé mounting bolts have the exact same lug design and are functionally identical, though methods of produce differ. Barrel or clip size and general length is certainly the same and both are battle-sivhted tó 300m. And one rifle incorporated an (inadequate) backing monopod for long-range firing and anti-aircraft places that were not oft used in combat. Factory marks of the Tóyo Kogyo: And thé Nagoya: Next you'll see the recipient markings. This will be an essential stage - despite the crude look, the IJA recognized this past due war rifle into the Emperor't service and it had been proclaimed and issued as a complete Type 99.
A several hundred rifles after this 7th collection was produced, Nagoya stopped rubber stamping the receivers 'Typé 99'. This should end up being considered as another time-saving measure introduced to the 'substitute standard' options, generally recognized by fixed sights, brief hand guards, and cruder exterior finishes. The 'alternative regular' can be not really to end up being baffled with 'final ditch' as per my responses above. What had been basically meant was that until some point point, possibly around the time they dropped the Kind 99 receiver screenplay, the intention has been that after Japanese success, the rifles with cutting corners on them might afterwards be upgraded to the earlier type 99 pattern with issues like monopods and dirt addresses. The final months of the war ushered in some final modifications like the ómission of sling swivels, omission of the dirt cover slots in the receiver, etc.
This final one is usually odd thinking of dust covers had not been set up at most industries since 1941. Today allow's appear at places. The early Kind 99 got aiming arms that could become used to shoot at low-flying plane. This might become the almost all useless function ever fielded by á ww2 belligerent.
Basically unless you were shooting at á WW1 biplane, yóu wouldn't strike a damn thing. Furthermore, the positive idea that Western infantrymen would escort effective fireplace (in volleys) out to 1500m has been a nonsensical left over from the Russo-Japanese war when area-firé machine-guns had yet to be fielded in ány numbers. In practisé, IJA troopers utilized the 300m battle view, and in thé late-war gun, the 300m fight sight pitcure stayed totally unchanged. The sighting user profile of both guns is identical. Next we move to the front side places. Both guns use the exact same cutting tool adjustable in the same way.
The original pattern front sight guards were fell mid-war as the protection they provided was suspicious to begin with and required valuable machining period to generate. Today you usually observe them mis-shapen on issued rifles, giving testament to théir fragility. You wiIl furthermore note the earlier rifle offers a finely fórm-stamped and machinéd collection of barrel or clip groups while the later on rifle's bands are produced of curved and welded smooth share.
The latter was very much cheaper to produce and worked well just simply because well. Perhaps no picture will better illustrate the sacrifice of type over functionality as Asia's war fortunes made worse than the right after photo. From the bolt main to the bolt encounter, both bolts are identical, though the later on battle bolt provides much less post-machining poIishing on the body and the chromium lining is definitely omitted from the bolt face.
Here the commonalities end. The early battle bolt had been falsified as one piece and carefully machined to contours, all machining scars polished away and the entire assembly had been mated to a linen metal dust cover up that was likely the item of Western observers on the Western Entrance in 1917. The late-war bolt has been produced from a cyIindrical ingot to cut down on machining steps with the bolt handle left only as a brief stub. A crudely cast (from low grade steel) bolt deal with was after that welded to the bolt body and the seam terrain flush.
The cocking item was produced without serration and the arch weld becoming a member of the fuel guard to the base was remaining undressed to react as the 'serration' to supply grasp. Both mounting bolts are usually indiscernibly identical in smoothness and function. If anything thé late-war boIt is usually a little much easier to function as it can be not slowed by dirt cover rubbing and the handles are usually a little Ionger owing to thé extra length required to facilitate deal with welding.
Use jdownloader with tor. With Mega, things are a bit different.
Finally, nothing screamed inexpensive to US sérvicemen like a wooden buttplate crudely nailed to the share. This is a obvious try by the Western to save steel after the People NAVY had ruthlessly culled the Western merchant fast. The solid wood plate can be useful but definitely provides to the cheap appearance of the alternative 99. As a final word, Main Common Julian S. Hatcher, in Hatcher'beds Notebook has been clear in his protection of the actions, including the late-war activity. In his opinion, supported by assessments at Aberdeen Proving Reasons, the Arisaka has been more powerful than even a late-production Michael1903.
Doesn'capital t sound extremely 'last say goodbye to' to me. For clearness on this matter, Hatcher mentioned that the Arisaka was packed up to 120,000 psi at which period the screening was ended with no observed breakdowns. All other military services bolt activities tested started to possess offered extractors at aróund 70,000 psi and started getting rid of locking lugs át around 90,000 psi.
Some of the bolt activities tested were the 03 Springfield, 1917 Enfield, and the German 98 Mauser. Hopefully that clears a several things upward and lays some common myths to rest.
I adore the assessment but possess to take problem with the disapproval of the aeroplanes sight wings. I observe a great deal of criticism about the rifles, the sights, the dust covers, the monopod, etc but frankly, these were very revolutionary improvements to the rifles and significantly from worthless. The critique probably arrives from the common bias against anything Japanese from WWII.
As an official in the US Military, I obtained instructions on how to shoot down aircraft with my Michael-16. I had been also expected to provide training to thosé under my control in how to do so.
Right now if the modern US Army still provides it's i9000 soldiers shooting at plane and armored helicopter airplane with a 5.56 circular, it is certainly not really a stretch to say that an impact could become produced with a very much weightier and more powerful Western round against slower and less armored plane. And for the report, the almost all common aircraft likely experienced by an infantryman was most likely going to end up being a liason/spotter aircraft which were as gradual as the WWl biplanes and much easier to take down. The Western were fairly methodical in their weaponry growth. I doubt they would include 'ineffective' products on their guns.
They just eliminated them late in the war when they were attempting to decrease materials, cost and time in production. Simply some ideas.
I recognize totally. I've acquired several 99'beds complete thru my fingers, and presently have my fathers (which he delivered back from the war from Okinawa) which will be a late war design. It sets like a champion. I also just finished changing some missing parts on a past due model 99 of a pal. He believed it has been an Enfield and I questioned him to show it to me. There't no mistaking án 99!
Japanese Arisaka Type 99 Serial Numbers
That peep that changed the reverse up sight actually appears to function pretty well, and must have got been excellent to train employees on utilization. I have to say that the appearance used to keep the prices down, which is certainly great by me as well! Nowadays even though, they aren't the discount in my neck of the guitar of the hardwoods that they utilized to end up being! I adore the assessment but have to take issue with the condemnation of the plane sight wings.
I discover a great deal of critique about the rifles, the places, the dirt covers, the monopod, etc but honestly, these were very innovative improvements to the rifles and far from useless. The criticism probably arrives from the common prejudice against anything Western from WWII. As an police officer in the US Military, I obtained education on how to capture down plane with my Meters-16. I had been also anticipated to supply training to thosé under my order in how to perform so. Today if the modern US Army still provides it't soldiers shooting at plane and armored helicopter aeroplanes with a 5.56 round, it can be not really a stretch out to state that an influence could become made with a very much heavier and more powerful Western circular against slower and much less armored plane. And for the report, the nearly all common aircraft likely found by an infantryman has been most likely going to end up being a liason/spotter airplane which were as gradual as the WWl biplanes and much easier to capture down. The Western were pretty systematic in their weapons development.
I doubt they would consist of 'useless' products on their rifles. They just removed them later in the war when they were trying to reduce materials, cost and time in manufacturing. Simply some thoughts.
Thanks for your understanding! The see on the AA view was centered on my individual opinion, not any test or fact and it's excellent that it's i9000 sparked some discussion The monopod has been an interesting function as properly, though in truth I think the reason it was dropped got more to perform with the elevation and publicity of the knight if it were implemented - it really puts you up now there and reduces cover. Since WW2, infantrymen usually wish to end up being as reduced to the surface as useful. The dust cover had been a great idea, but utilized up precious steel much better allocated elsewhere in my watch. The Germans developed a comparable cover up in WW1, after that fallen it as being to expensive for the small get. (we're talking economies over large numbers of guns right here). Give thanks to you Claven2.
Type 99 Arisaka Serial Numbers
My past due father has been in the Us all Navy blue during WW2 and was given a gun as a war memento at the finish of the battle. It experienced been rendered inoperable by oné of the máchinists aboard his dispatch - something about the bolt being 'welded'. I keep in mind him informing me that was the standing up order at the time. Anyway, he provided me the rifle when I was a kid.
I recall running close to in the backyard with this point playing war video games with my buddies. Good gawd, the issue was heavier than I was. The gun has become seated in my outdated childhood bed room wardrobe for the final 40 decades. I consider it out when I regularly visit my mom - not often sufficiently since she'h 2000 mls away.
Even though it's ended up a several decades, I still still have a apparent picture in my thoughts remember lots of information about it. I've usually believed of getting it renewed to firing condition. I've continually wanted to understand even more but never discovered the period to study it. But now for the first period, I know what it in fact is. Becomes out I have an earlier type 99, with mono-pod, aircraft sights, metallic butt-plate, unchanged chrysanthemum, etc. The bayonet was lost longer ago, in one of the numerous military techniques we made to different bases around the world, and there will be no sling. But today I possess a place to begin.
Thanks once again for a great write-up. I am fresh to this discussion board and relatively new to gathering military excess fire arms. As you appear extremely knowlagable in this issue I has been wondering if you can assist me. I recently purchased a type 99 arisaka which from what I can inform is a Toyo Kogyo mid war type 99. I has been making use of the bolt bicycling it when it got stuck closed and after that the safty item at the back again of the bolt emerged off.
I have not long been capable to get it to move back on and I can not obtain the bolt open up. Any help you can provide me would be great.
Castle-Thunder.com: Western Arisaka Gun Identification Japan Rifle Recognition Main Page - Back to Primary Page Receiver Markings Japanese Guns 1897-1945 Contemporary Japanese rifles were produced in different adjustments and calibers at several located thoughout Japan, China, and Korea fróm about 1897 through 1945. Beneath are the markings on rifles in 6.5 Japanese Caliber manufactured from 1897 until the mid 1940't. These guns include: The Type 30 Lengthy Gun and Carbine, the Type 35 Rifle, the Kind 38 Long Rifle, Short Rifle, and Carbine, thé Type 44 Carbine, the Type 97 Sniper Gun, and the Italian language Type I Very long Rifle.